That's almost exactly what happened this time last year, when Apple took the wraps off the iPad Mini. A second generation of that device is expected next week, alongside a completely redesigned full-size iPad.
The event takes place at the Yerba Buena Center for the Arts Theater in downtown San Francisco, and is expected to be the last of the year from Apple. Earlier this year, the company told Wall Street to expect a "busy" fall, with more on the way in early 2014.
While much of the attention has focused on the iPhone and iPad -- which bring in the vast majority of Apple's profits -- all eyes are on the company to expand into other areas, including wearable technology and home entertainment. Neither of those two things are expected to be shown off at Tuesday's event. Here's a quick breakdown of what is:
New iPads Apple's expected to show off a completely redesigned full-sized iPad, as well as souped up iPad Mini. In the run-up to next Tuesday's event, there have been myriad leaks of both tablets -- many of which were posted by the same individuals who correctly showed off iPhone parts, months before their debut.
The full-sized iPad leaks suggest Apple's adopting a nearly identical look to the iPad Mini, with slimmer sides and tighter angling on the back. Leaks of the smaller have suggested Apple plans to offer the tablet in its newer "space gray" color, as well as include a Retina Display, which was missing from last year's model. Alongside those models, new Apple Smart Covers are expected, and are believed to be the ones that leaked out last month.
What remains unclear is whether Apple will carry over its Touch ID fingerprint system from the iPhone 5S to these new tablets. A leaked photo earlier this week suggested as much. Yet features like vibration, LED flashes, and some design treatments haven't always carried over from phones to the company's tablets. However the home button (where the sensor is) is a primary user feature.
Mavericks was shown off in June, and hit "golden master" status earlier this month.
(Credit: Apple)
OS X Mavericks Apple showed off Mavericks at its annual developers conference in June with the promise of a release later this year. With that deadline fast approaching, and a final version of the software delivered to developers earlier this month, Mavericks is a shoe-in for a price and a release date -- possibly the same day of the event.
As with other recent major OS X releases, Mavericks brings a few more carryovers from iOS, like iBooks and Apple's mapping service. Apple's also fine-tuned existing software like the Finder, the Calendar app, and its notifications service.
One of the areas where Apple could go into more detail are some of the power management features built into Mavericks. These features could extend the battery life of its portable computers, even older models.
Apple's new Mac Pro, shown off at WWDC in June.
(Credit: James Martin/CNET)
Mac Pro Alongside Mavericks, another WWDC tease was the new Mac Pro, which is a complete rethink of Apple's desktop workstation. Apple showed off an early version of that hardware at WWDC, but didn't give it a price, release date, or a live demo of its performance.
The new Mac Pro is a cylinder with an open center that vents the air from the inside. It replaces a decade old design of the Mac Pro tower, which itself evolved from the PowerMac G5. New features include a speedier processor, a move to flash memory, Thunderbolt 2, HDMI, and USB 3.0.
A computer that was believed to the new Mac Pro began appearing in some online benchmarks in June, and once again late last month. More recently, a report from the Austin American-Statesman suggested that Flextronics America, which does some contract manufacturing for Apple in the past, was hiring some 1,700 employees to build the machine in Texas.
Apple's 13-inch MacBook Pro with Retina Display.
(Credit: CNET)
MacBook Pro(s) Both versions of Apple's MacBook Pro are overdue for updates. The Retina Display MacBooks were first introduced in 2012, and got a price cut and spec bump this February. For 2013, expect at least an upgrade to Intel's newest Haswell processors, which should bring longer battery life and better performance.
The "regular" old non-Retina versions haven't been updated since last June, when they got a processor speed bump, improved graphics cards, and USB 3.0. But as the last remaining Mac with a disc drive -- something Apple's removed from all of its devices -- the non-Retina MacBook Pros are occupying a mid-range in the company's notebook line that may be squeezed between the high-end Retina laptops and the entry-level Airs.
Mac Mini The Mac Mini -- Apple's least expensive Mac computer -- hasn't been updated since last October, and could use a bump to Intel's newest 2013 "Haswell" processors. It's already got much of Apple's newer I/O, including a Thunderbolt port, HDMI and USB 3.0. Beside the processor, the machine could benefit from speedier 802.11ac Wi-Fi and perhaps even a jump to the newer Thunderbolt 2 spec.
Thunderbolt 2 monitor Apple hasn't updated its $999 display since introducing it in late 2011, and a lot's changed since then.
The current model still uses the first version Apple's MagSafe power connection instead of MagSafe 2. The company's given out adapters to new buyers, but it's less than ideal. The monitor is also still on the older USB 2.0 spec.
If Apple's introducing its new Mac Pro, and refreshed Pro notebooks -- it's as good a time as any to push out a new version of this aging display. A new version could also make use of Thunderbolt 2, which promises to push more data while supporting devices on the older spec. The bigger question is whether Apple intends to continue making a monitor for desktop users when the majority of its devices are tablets and phones that can't hook up to it.
iLife tweaks Another wildcard is iLife, the creative software Apple includes with its Macs, and now also gives out alongside iWork to new iOS device buyers. The last big update to iLife came in 2010, although Apple's added new features in supplemental updates since then, along with introducing the various iOS counterparts.
New, iOS 7-inspired logos for that software cropped up this week suggesting the iOS apps might be getting an overhaul. It's unclear whether that same thing will carry over to the Mac versions as part of a larger feature update. And if that happens, there's a very real question of whether Apple will charge existing iLife for Mac users, or if the update will be free.
CNET will be there live to cover Tuesday's event, and you can sign up for a reminder by clicking the image below:
Anything you think we missed? Leave it in the comments.
When Google acquired Android in 2005 and subsequently unveiled it in 2007, there was no such thing as ChromeOS yet. Google’s entire OS effort was on Android, and separately the company worked on the Chrome browser for desktop and mobile operating systems.
Over the last year we’ve started to see Google have success with ChromeOS in the notebook computer market. Android and ChromeOS are both based on Linux, but that’s pretty much where the similarities end. ChromeOS is a very thin client, almost everything is done via the browser.
On a personal level, I’ve now gotten to the point where I’d rather consume content on a touch screen device. I prefer swiping my finger on a screen to navigate a website rather than being forced to use a trackpad. This tells me all computers will be touchscreen soon, just like all mobile devices already are.
So this raises the question — why would Google want to maintain two operating systems down the road? I don’t think they want this. And I’m trying to get my head around the possible solutions.
Lomography, maker of your favorite retro plastic film cameras, is diving into the world of digital with a new package of three experimental lenses for micro four thirds mirrorless cameras. The photos look pretty incredible, even if they're not exactly "high quality."
NEW YORK (Reuters) - A deal between SAC Capital and U.S. prosecutors to resolve a criminal insider trading case against the firm could come in a few days, a source familiar with the matter said on Thursday.
Any potential deal between Steven A. Cohen's SAC Capital and federal authorities would likely involve some admission of liability by the firm, the source said.
The Wall Street Journal and The New York Times both previously reported that a deal between the hedge fund and prosecutors was close and could involve a penalty of more than $1 billion (619.1 million pounds).
(Reporting by Matthew Goldstein; Editing by Gerald E. McCormick)
Ancient Syrians favored buying local to outsourcing production
Public release date: 16-Oct-2013 [
| E-mail
| Share
]
Contact: Amy Stone a.f.stone@shef.ac.uk 01-142-221-046 University of Sheffield
An archaeologist at the University of Sheffield has found evidence that, contrary to a widely held theory, ancient Syrians made their stone tools locally instead of importing finished tools from Turkey.
The discovery, newly published online in Journal of Archaeological Science, has implications for our understanding of how early cities developed in these regions and how the geographic origins of raw materials affect developing states.
During the Early Bronze Age, around 5300 to 3100 years ago, blades made of chert and obsidian remained important despite the advent of metal tools. Much sharper than bronze tools, the stone blades were used for various cutting and scraping purposes, including agricultural activities, food processing, and crafts such as pottery and textile production.
Dr Ellery Frahm from the University's Department of Archaeology explained: "There is a prevalent idea that these blades were not made locally in Northern Mesopotamia, what is now Syria. It has been widely claimed that the blades were made in specialised workshops in southeast Turkey and then exported to villages and early cities throughout what is now Turkey, Syria, and Iraq."
However, Dr Frahm studied the origins of obsidian tools from various archaeological sites, including Tell Mozan where he has excavated, and showed that their raw materials originated from a variety of geological sources across Turkey, not merely those nearest the proposed workshop sites.
Dr Frahm continued: "This diversity of raw-material sources is inconsistent with export from highly specialised workshops in just one area of Turkey. Some of the artefacts' geological sources were hundreds of kilometres from the supposed blade workshops.
"The diverse obsidian origins, when combined with stone tool debris from the sites, suggests local production. Rather than arriving at the cities as finished blades, obsidian instead arrived as chunks, what are known as cores or preforms, and were brought by visitors either from diverse regions or with diverse itineraries. Instead of distant 'industrial' manufacturing, the materials for the blades reached the hands of the cities' specialists involved in household production principally for the local market."
Dr Frahm likens the situation to modern-day Syria: "Domestic manufacturing has been protected from competition by imports. Unlike its neighbour Jordan, there are no McDonalds or Starbucks, and until recently, Pepsi, Coca-Cola, and other international companies were banned from Syria.
"When our team headed into town for supplies, the shops had locally produced goods. The chemist had locally made pharmaceuticals and personal care products, while the market had local food and drink, paper products, even batteries. The beer was local too, brewed in Damascus and Aleppo."
This study of millennia-old stone tools also relates to contemporary issues of manufacturing and the uneven geographic distribution of raw-material resources around the world.
"The choice of which raw-material sources to use in manufacturing can have broad societal effects," explained Frahm. "Consider the rare earth elements, or REEs, crucial for electronics manufacturing. Your mobile phone and its battery, for example, depend on REEs to function. Until the 1980s, mines in California were the leading producers of REEs.
"Today, however, China supplies 90 percent of the REEs used in manufacturing despite only controlling one quarter of the world's supply. This is due, in part, to Chinese mines using extraction methods banned in the US. China has repeatedly reduced REE exports by as much as 30 percent per year. As a result, manufacturers dependent on these supplies have had to relocate their factories to China, and it is more profitable for China to export finished products instead of raw materials. This, in turn, has led to a range of geo-political consequences, such as recent American surveys for REEs in Afghanistan."
Dr Frahm sees parallels between REEs for electronics and obsidian for stone blades. The residents of ancient Syrian cities, he notes, imported raw materials like obsidian and locally produced the tools, rather than importing finished objects from distant workshops. He explained: "Knowing where these stone blades were produced allows us to start answering questions regarding the social relations linked to their production and distribution.
"Was there large-scale production under government control, or were the blades made by entrepreneurs working out of their homes? Who had the skills to made the blades, and where did they live and work? There were also effects on activities linked to these blades. Was agricultural output dependent on shipments of tools made by distant labourers, or were the tools made by the farmers themselves during the off season?"
Dr Frahm concluded: "Archaeological research can demonstrate that there are broad societal effects due to our choices regarding which raw-material sources to use and where our goods are produced."
With nearly 25,000 of the brightest students from 117 countries coming to learn alongside 1,209 of the world's best academics, it is clear why the University of Sheffield is one of the UK's leading universities. Staff and students at Sheffield are committed to helping discover and understand the causes of things - and propose solutions that have the power to transform the world we live in.
A member of the Russell Group, the University of Sheffield has a reputation for world-class teaching and research excellence across a wide range of disciplines. The University of Sheffield has been named University of the Year in the Times Higher Education Awards 2011 for its exceptional performance in research, teaching, access and business performance. In addition, the University has won four Queen's Anniversary Prizes (1998, 2000, 2002, 2007), recognising the outstanding contribution by universities and colleges to the United Kingdom's intellectual, economic, cultural and social life.
One of the markers of a leading university is the quality of its alumni and Sheffield boasts five Nobel Prize winners among former staff and students. Its alumni have gone on to hold positions of great responsibility and influence all over the world, making significant contributions in their chosen fields.
Research partners and clients include Boeing, Rolls-Royce, Unilever, Boots, AstraZeneca, GSK, Siemens, Yorkshire Water, and many more household names, as well as UK and overseas government agencies and charitable foundations.
The University has well-established partnerships with a number of universities and major corporations, both in the UK and abroad. The White Rose University Consortium (White Rose) is a strategic partnership between 3 of the UK's leading research universities of Leeds, Sheffield and York. Since its creation in 1997 White Rose has secured more than 100M into the Universities.
For further information, please visit http://www.sheffield.ac.uk
Contact
For further information please contact:
Amy Stone
Media Relations Officer
The University of Sheffield
0114 222 1046
a.f.stone@sheffield.ac.uk
[
| E-mail
| Share
]
AAAS and EurekAlert! are not responsible for the accuracy of news releases posted to EurekAlert! by contributing institutions or for the use of any information through the EurekAlert! system.
Ancient Syrians favored buying local to outsourcing production
Public release date: 16-Oct-2013 [
| E-mail
| Share
]
Contact: Amy Stone a.f.stone@shef.ac.uk 01-142-221-046 University of Sheffield
An archaeologist at the University of Sheffield has found evidence that, contrary to a widely held theory, ancient Syrians made their stone tools locally instead of importing finished tools from Turkey.
The discovery, newly published online in Journal of Archaeological Science, has implications for our understanding of how early cities developed in these regions and how the geographic origins of raw materials affect developing states.
During the Early Bronze Age, around 5300 to 3100 years ago, blades made of chert and obsidian remained important despite the advent of metal tools. Much sharper than bronze tools, the stone blades were used for various cutting and scraping purposes, including agricultural activities, food processing, and crafts such as pottery and textile production.
Dr Ellery Frahm from the University's Department of Archaeology explained: "There is a prevalent idea that these blades were not made locally in Northern Mesopotamia, what is now Syria. It has been widely claimed that the blades were made in specialised workshops in southeast Turkey and then exported to villages and early cities throughout what is now Turkey, Syria, and Iraq."
However, Dr Frahm studied the origins of obsidian tools from various archaeological sites, including Tell Mozan where he has excavated, and showed that their raw materials originated from a variety of geological sources across Turkey, not merely those nearest the proposed workshop sites.
Dr Frahm continued: "This diversity of raw-material sources is inconsistent with export from highly specialised workshops in just one area of Turkey. Some of the artefacts' geological sources were hundreds of kilometres from the supposed blade workshops.
"The diverse obsidian origins, when combined with stone tool debris from the sites, suggests local production. Rather than arriving at the cities as finished blades, obsidian instead arrived as chunks, what are known as cores or preforms, and were brought by visitors either from diverse regions or with diverse itineraries. Instead of distant 'industrial' manufacturing, the materials for the blades reached the hands of the cities' specialists involved in household production principally for the local market."
Dr Frahm likens the situation to modern-day Syria: "Domestic manufacturing has been protected from competition by imports. Unlike its neighbour Jordan, there are no McDonalds or Starbucks, and until recently, Pepsi, Coca-Cola, and other international companies were banned from Syria.
"When our team headed into town for supplies, the shops had locally produced goods. The chemist had locally made pharmaceuticals and personal care products, while the market had local food and drink, paper products, even batteries. The beer was local too, brewed in Damascus and Aleppo."
This study of millennia-old stone tools also relates to contemporary issues of manufacturing and the uneven geographic distribution of raw-material resources around the world.
"The choice of which raw-material sources to use in manufacturing can have broad societal effects," explained Frahm. "Consider the rare earth elements, or REEs, crucial for electronics manufacturing. Your mobile phone and its battery, for example, depend on REEs to function. Until the 1980s, mines in California were the leading producers of REEs.
"Today, however, China supplies 90 percent of the REEs used in manufacturing despite only controlling one quarter of the world's supply. This is due, in part, to Chinese mines using extraction methods banned in the US. China has repeatedly reduced REE exports by as much as 30 percent per year. As a result, manufacturers dependent on these supplies have had to relocate their factories to China, and it is more profitable for China to export finished products instead of raw materials. This, in turn, has led to a range of geo-political consequences, such as recent American surveys for REEs in Afghanistan."
Dr Frahm sees parallels between REEs for electronics and obsidian for stone blades. The residents of ancient Syrian cities, he notes, imported raw materials like obsidian and locally produced the tools, rather than importing finished objects from distant workshops. He explained: "Knowing where these stone blades were produced allows us to start answering questions regarding the social relations linked to their production and distribution.
"Was there large-scale production under government control, or were the blades made by entrepreneurs working out of their homes? Who had the skills to made the blades, and where did they live and work? There were also effects on activities linked to these blades. Was agricultural output dependent on shipments of tools made by distant labourers, or were the tools made by the farmers themselves during the off season?"
Dr Frahm concluded: "Archaeological research can demonstrate that there are broad societal effects due to our choices regarding which raw-material sources to use and where our goods are produced."
With nearly 25,000 of the brightest students from 117 countries coming to learn alongside 1,209 of the world's best academics, it is clear why the University of Sheffield is one of the UK's leading universities. Staff and students at Sheffield are committed to helping discover and understand the causes of things - and propose solutions that have the power to transform the world we live in.
A member of the Russell Group, the University of Sheffield has a reputation for world-class teaching and research excellence across a wide range of disciplines. The University of Sheffield has been named University of the Year in the Times Higher Education Awards 2011 for its exceptional performance in research, teaching, access and business performance. In addition, the University has won four Queen's Anniversary Prizes (1998, 2000, 2002, 2007), recognising the outstanding contribution by universities and colleges to the United Kingdom's intellectual, economic, cultural and social life.
One of the markers of a leading university is the quality of its alumni and Sheffield boasts five Nobel Prize winners among former staff and students. Its alumni have gone on to hold positions of great responsibility and influence all over the world, making significant contributions in their chosen fields.
Research partners and clients include Boeing, Rolls-Royce, Unilever, Boots, AstraZeneca, GSK, Siemens, Yorkshire Water, and many more household names, as well as UK and overseas government agencies and charitable foundations.
The University has well-established partnerships with a number of universities and major corporations, both in the UK and abroad. The White Rose University Consortium (White Rose) is a strategic partnership between 3 of the UK's leading research universities of Leeds, Sheffield and York. Since its creation in 1997 White Rose has secured more than 100M into the Universities.
For further information, please visit http://www.sheffield.ac.uk
Contact
For further information please contact:
Amy Stone
Media Relations Officer
The University of Sheffield
0114 222 1046
a.f.stone@sheffield.ac.uk
[
| E-mail
| Share
]
AAAS and EurekAlert! are not responsible for the accuracy of news releases posted to EurekAlert! by contributing institutions or for the use of any information through the EurekAlert! system.
The Google Offers app for Android has been a bit behind the times when it comes to design, but today's update brings it in line with its brand brethren. The new version offers sidebar navigation and a card-based interface, as well as a few adjustments to the way the app actually works. Now, instead ...
Naw, I'm only kidding you're GMing the way that works for you.
I was talking to Viceversus and we figured it might be cool to get the ball rolling on a discussion between GMs about the way we tell our stories or play our games. Actually that's an interesting place to begin do you view yourself as helping to tell story or as an umpire in a game? I've always viewed RPing as a collaborative writing activity with no "winners" or "losers".
These days I run my RPs along the short story system, I don't know what it's really called that's just what I call it.
The basic idea is the GM creates a quest giver characters that supply the RPers with an objective, the RPers then write about how they achieve the objective in a single post. It works pretty well in small groups of RPers who like to write too much.the RPers explain how their character achieved or failed the mission and the GM writes about how their actions affect the world.
It's really good at certain things but is limited in other ways. For example it's great at character development, building a sense of a epic story quite quickly but it sucks at interactions between characters. It sucks so much at character interaction in my most recent RP I had include a sub RP just for the Characters to interact in.
So how do other GMs run their games? Is anyone doing anything different or outside of the norm they'd like to share?